Who Is The Little Horn of Daniel 7?
The little horn of Daniel 7 is often interpreted as the Roman Catholic Church. Many see the the Pope and the Roman church embodied in Daniel’s prophecy which they carry through to Revelation 17. I was taught this view also, but never accepted it as true.
Others see the little horn of Daniel as the United States. While their are some striking similarities in the political alliance that the U.S. has with the settlement of Israel in the present, we must equally question the accuracy of this interpretation.
Our approach will be to determine the historical setting in which we find the events of Daniel, an examination of the context and finally a comparison with corresponding verses in the New Testament.
The Little Horn in Daniel 7 and 8
Some also see the little horn of Daniel 8 equal to that of chapter 7. However, the two are not equated in chapter 8. There is a description of the two horns of chapter 8, in which the ram which had two horns with one being higher than the other. The smaller horn on the goat is never called the little horn. Further, the goat which attacked the ram broke his two horns (Dan. 76-7), generally accepted as the Macedonian or Grecian kingdom which destroyed the Medo Persian kingdom.
The male goat has a “large” horn, thus is not the little horn of Daniel 7. We are told specifically by Daniel that the ram having the two horns are the kings of Media and Persia, (Dan. 8:20). The male goat with the broken horn replaced by four others was the kingdom of Greece, (Dan. 8:21).
The four kingdoms represent:
- Lysimachus received Thrace and much of Asia minor
- Cassander received Macedonia and Greece
- Seleucus received Syria and the vast region of the east
- Ptolemy received Egypt, Palestine, and Arabia
Interpreters seemed settled to assign the little horn to a king which comes out of Syria, Antiochus Epiphanes. Correspondingly, they admit the difficulties of the language in the context surrounding that view. Given the language in Dan. 8:10-14, the little horn has the same characteristics as that of chapter 7:8, 11, 20, 25.
The Little Horn of Daniel 7
It is my judgment, that the little horn of the Bible appears in Daniel chapter 2. The image which Nebuchadnezzar saw and its interpretation by Daniel tells the same story. The head, arms and chests, and belly and thighs, represent Babylon, Medo-Persia and Greece. This corresponds to the beasts of chapter 7 of Lion, bear and leopard.
The legs of iron per chapter 2 is the fourth beast of chapter 7 and identifies with Rome. The feet made part of iron and part of clay which did not mix describes the relationship between Rome and Israel. At the time the events are fulfilled, Israel is subjected to Rome but does not mix well as iron does not mix with clay.
Jeremiah 18 spoke of Israel as clay. Because of the laws of the Jews and the gods of Rome, while joined under one government, they did not mix. Jews and Gentiles theocratically could not merge. The little horn of Daniel 7 identifies with the feet and toes of Daniel’s vision. It was small compared to the other beasts in the image in both visions.
The Common Foe of the Little Horn as Antichrist
The little horn antichrist has a common foe in each chapter. Observe chapter 2 that a “stone” cut out of the mountains without hands, a clear reference to Christ, who comes on the clouds in his kingdom in the last days strikes the image so that it disintegrates together, Dan. 2:25, 44-45.
The corresponding defeat of the little horn of Daniel 7 occurs with the coming of the Ancient of Days, 7:21-22 who equals the stone cut out of the mountain without hands of ch. 2. Therefore, the events are parallel, recapitulations of the other.
Identifying the Little Horn of Daniel 7
One point to remember is that the little horn of Daniel 7 has very distinguishable qualities from all the rest. He arises not as, but among the ten horned beast. As this occurs, the three first horns fall in his presence. This means the little horn is not an individual. For those who believe he is the “human” antichrist must accept the disappointing news. There is no possible way a man can live through three successive kingdoms that span hundreds of years. A kingdom can.
Nor must we conclude the little horn uprooted these three kingdoms. The text only says, before (in the presence) of whom, were three kings subdued.
Next, the little horn cannot be part of the 10 horned beast for that would make it an 11 horn beast. To uproot three of its first kings means only 7 would be left, 8 with the little horn. Yet, this same beast is described as having 10 horns in Rev. 13:1, with the same beastly identity described in Dan. 7:1-6.
The Little Horn Makes War With the Saints
Described as the “other” horn which came up among the ten horns, (7;20), and before which three fell, who had eyes and a mouth which spoke pompous words, whose appearance was greater than his fellows, this horn is unique. His chutzpah evidences itself in raising up to make war with the saints in rebellion against the Ancient of Days, who is the Christ, their defender. He prevails against them in persecution and murders until the Ancient of Days comes and judgment is given to the saints of the Most High, i.e. to Christians or the true seed of Abraham.
[add_to_cart_btn_style_3 link=”http://www.allthingsfulfilled.com/shop/daniels-70-weeks-resurrection/” + target=”_self”] [/add_to_cart_btn_style_3]
In Revelation, the 10 horned (fourth and dreadful beast) hates the little horn (the harlot) and burns her with fire until the words of God are fulfilled. Compare Rev. 11:2, 17:18.
In future studies we will show parallels of the little horn of Daniel 7 to correlate with the little horn as antichrist.
The said little horn was Herod Agrippa 1. The three kings before him were Pontius Pilate in Judea, Herod Antipas in Galilee and Herod Philip 2 in Ituraea. He assume as king of the said three provinces in 41 BC under emperor Caligula, one of the beast. Agripa died in 44 B.C. as stated in Acts 12:18-23
This is the first time I’ve heard that Agrippa was the little horn. The problem as I see it is the conflict with Daniel 7:21-22. The little horn makes war with the saints and prevails against them until the Ancient of Days came. Christ identifies himself as the one who comes in the clouds as the Ancient of Days in Matt. 26:63-64 when he addresses Caiaphas the High Priest. This is why he is charged with blasphemy.
So how is it that Herod lives until the coming of the Lord who defeats the little horn in 70 A.D.? According to Acts 12:23 he is stricken with sickness and dies with his flesh having been eaten of worms. That neither harmonizes with Daniel’s account nor the account of the man of sin in 2 Thes. 2:4f
Nor does it harmonize with the text that states the beasts had their “lives” taken away but their dominions continued for a season and time, 7:12. However, Babylon, Medo-Persia and Greece continue in the Roman beast per Rev. 13:1. This harmonizes with Daniel 2:35 because the image would be struck as “one image” and all of them fall together. As one nation subdued another that subdued nation continued to live under its captor. That is how their lives were prolonged for a season and time.
The defeat of Rome (times of the Gentiles) is prophetically bound up in the defeat of Israel, the little horn, Luke. 21:20-24.
Finally, the real attention in the text is never against the 4th beast, but the little horn. As in Dan. 7, he prospers until the “wrath of God” has been accomplished, Dan. 11:36, but is defeated. That is why chapter 12 shows that at that time Michael would stand to deliver his people, but the vision would culminate at the time of the resurrection and the power of the holy people being completely shattered in the time of the end. Dan. 12:1-7.